Case Study
Industrial plants can face costly nuisance dust claims
Industries whose production or manufacturing facilities emit
particulate are subject to EPA and other regulatory standards. To
meet these standards, industry carefully regularly monitors the
amount of particulate produced and is concerned with any residue
generated by their facilities. A citizens group (plaintiff) filed a
lawsuit against an industry defendant claiming that nuisance
particulate from the defendant’s industrial facility blackened and
stained plaintiffs' property surfaces causing damages. The
plaintiffs contended that these damages were of such significance
that they should be compensated. The industry defendant, in turn,
filed a third-party claim against a neighboring industrial plant
alleging that the neighbor plant (third party) was responsible for
generating the nuisance dust.
The third-party defendant’s law firm retained RJ Lee Group to
investigate the claims brought by both the plaintiff and the
industry defendant. To determine where the nuisance dust was coming
from, we investigated the area and collected and analyzed source
samples from the plants and outside surfaces in the plants'
vicinity. Distinguishing between particles generated from different
sources requires confirmation of particle size, morphology,
agglomerate association and elemental composition. Using optical
and high-resolution electron microscopy, we were able to
characterize the particulate in question and compare the results to
the various plant source material. We studied the meteorological
data and how it affected particle deposition in the area in
question and we evaluated plaintiff experts' studies as well. Armed
with comprehensive data we were able to reach our conclusions with
scientific certainty.
RJ Lee Group's investigative study demonstrated that the
preponderance of nuisance dust was not generated by our client's
industrial facility. We issued an expert report, provided
supporting data and deposition testimony.
















Follow Us